<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CramerEffect.com &#187; dow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cramereffect.com/tag/dow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cramereffect.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the Stock Pick&#039;s of Jim Cramer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cramer Calls Intel Too Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.cramereffect.com/2010/07/cramer-calls-intel-too-cheap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cramereffect.com/2010/07/cramer-calls-intel-too-cheap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asml holdings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow chemical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim cramer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novellus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductor sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cramereffect.com/2010/07/cramer-calls-intel-too-cheap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Cramer told investors on yesterday’s Mad Money show that Intel is "just too cheap".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=INTC">INTC</a>: 26.64 <font color="#FF0000">0.00%</font>) just reported a good quarter. Actually, they posted a great quarter. In fact, it was the best quarter in the history of the company. However, Wall Street seemed to take little notice. Intel delivered a solid earnings beat and provided strong guidance, but the stock only rose 1.7%.</p>
<p>Jim Cramer told investors on yesterday’s Mad Money show that Intel is &#8220;just too cheap&#8221;. It is astounding that Intel trades at a lower multiple than International Paper (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=IP">IP</a>: 31.11 <font color="#FF0000">0.00%</font>) or Dow Chemical (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=DOW">DOW</a>: 33.86 <font color="#FF0000">0.00%</font>). Cramer said that he has never seen that happen before. </p>
<p>Cramer believes the market has oversold the entire semiconductor sector. However, the strong results from Intel along with bullish data from Novellus (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=NVLS">NVLS</a>: 48.20 <font color="#FF0000">0.00%</font>) and ASML Holdings (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=ASML">ASML</a>: 45.13 <font color="#FF0000">0.00%</font>) point to reasons to be bullish on the sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cramereffect.com/2010/07/cramer-calls-intel-too-cheap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cramer Recommends Gannett After Strong Earnings Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.cramereffect.com/2009/07/cramer-recommends-gannett-after-strong-earnings-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cramereffect.com/2009/07/cramer-recommends-gannett-after-strong-earnings-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cramer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dryships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gannett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim cramer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second quarter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cramereffect.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday night’s Mad Money show, Jim Cramer weighed in on Gannett’s impressive second quarter earnings results. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dow Jones industrial average ended a nice rally this week with a 32 points on Friday to finish at 8,744. The Dow rose every day this week on the back of strong earnings reports beginning with Intel (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=INTC">INTC</a>: 26.64 <font color="#FF0000">0.00%</font>). In fact, all six of the Dow stocks that reported earnings this last week delivered better than expected results. </p>
<p>While not a Dow component, one of the bigger earnings surprises this week was Gannett (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=GCI">GCI</a>: 14.72 <font color="#FF0000">0.00%</font>). The newspaper publisher reported $.46 EPS for the second quarter, while Wall Street was only expecting $.36 EPS. The markets took notice – sending their shares up 29% on Wednesday.</p>
<p>On Thursday night’s Mad Money show, Jim Cramer weighed in on Gannett’s impressive results. &#8220;I thought that quarter was really something. They put it together. Maybe the cost cuts really will do it. I am not in a million years going to dump after that. I wish them the best of luck. I think that you will have a 50% move in Gannett.&#8221; </p>
<p>While the stock didn’t jump 50%, it did gain another 4.8% on Friday after Cramer’s bullish recommendation.</p>
<p>Other Cramer bullish stock picks: </p>
<p>NCR Corp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=NCR">NCR</a>: 21.19 <font color="#FF0000">0.00%</font>) dropped 2.3% &#8211; &#8220;I do not like the end markets of NCR… I am not going to recommend buying it… that stock has really got hammered ever since my friend, buddy, pal and supporter of Mad Money, Mark Hurd, left that company.&#8221;</p>
<p>DryShips (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=DRYS">DRYS</a>: 2.76 <font color="#FF0000">0.00%</font>) fell 1.9% &#8211; &#8220;The thing does trade like a banshee&#8230;I am a seller of DryShips.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cramereffect.com/2009/07/cramer-recommends-gannett-after-strong-earnings-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

